Back to zzTakeoff Community Channel LogoQ & A

New to GC Estimating - Production Rates, Equipment Rates & Assembly Libraries Question

I’m relatively new to GC estimating, although I have several years of experience preparing detailed subcontractor estimates.


On the subcontractor side, I’m used to estimating from a historical cost database and building assemblies around known labor production rates and man-hours from previous projects. As I transition into GC estimating, I’m curious how other estimators establish their labor production rates and equipment rates, especially when they don’t yet have much company-specific historical data.


I know RSMeans can sometimes be viewed skeptically in the construction industry, but for a GC that is just starting to build its estimating database, is it reasonable to rely on third-party production and cost data as a starting point and then refine those rates with actual project performance?


If so, what third-party resources have you found to be the most reliable for production rates, equipment rates, and general estimating benchmarks?


Also, does anyone have a GC estimating assembly library or sample database they would be willing to share? I’m mainly looking for something to use as a starting framework while we develop our own historical data.

0

You’re still thinking like a sub. We don’t track any of that as a GC…. Yet anyway.


watch this overview I did and let your Zztakeoff rep know if you want a similar GC template we start with. LINK


Now if you self perform work as a GC then we absolutely go to that level and have a process for that.


Different worlds, different people, separate buckets. I feel like I should write a children’s book on these two worlds 🤔.


Book Title:


GCs Don’t Count Like Subs Do.

Oh RS means is a great baseline for production and they will have a integration here soon depending on their MCP eta.


@Sam with Gordian update?

@Kyle thanks for looping me in! We are looking into additional integration capabilities and would love to learn more about what's capable here.


@Josh - in my experience, what you're describing (start from 3rd party benchmark like RSM and then refine with your own data) is a strong model. Happy to connect anytime to talk about getting an assembly library started.

You must be logged in to post replies. If you don't have an account you can signup here.