Assemblies and formulas

We don't have an exact date, but we're working on it as fast as we can. I can say it's near the top of our priority list along with wall heights, slopes, layer visibility per user, grouping projects in folders, rotate pages, and converting items to different types.

This will be huge! let me know if you need a test dummy. Red rover, send Kyle on over?

We would love to have your input once we get this ready for testing. We have our DEV server and we'll make sure your account is active on there for early testing. At some point, we want to have an official "Inside Track Program" where users can sign up for access on the DEV server. We'll get that more organized and official as we move forward. Right now, it blocks any new accounts unless we specifically allow.

I would also like to see what’s going on dev side as well, since I will need to thoroughly understand your implementation in order to prepare data for POS.

Sounds good. Once we get a little closer to the next release, we'll put it on DEV and make sure you guys have access. 🙂

Putting my name in the hat for DEV as well

I have just downloaded a trial version. There is actually no value in this tool for me as it is. Far better for me to continue with the current tools that I am using.

Do you have a current target for your release with assemblies so I can have look at a trial then..

@Geoff,

Following our call I have sent a follow up email and look forward to your reply

For those interested in playing with our latest development version, check out our latest post in Inside Track:

https://www.zztakeoff.com/app/community/inside-track/test-the-latest-on-our-dev-server

Awesome! Gonna check it out. Thanks

Thanks for your patience. Templates, items, & assemblies are available in our latest release. 🙂

Hi! Herber,

I just watched your YouTube podcast with Todd Kaberline and your team about zzTakeoff, and I have to say—it looks like a very promising tool. I’ve been following Todd’s channel for quite a while now, and his insights—especially on database lists and using MS Query—have been incredibly helpful in boosting productivity.

From what I’ve seen, zzTakeoff could be a strong alternative for builders, estimators alike. It seems to strike a balance between usability and powerful automation features that many traditional tools lack.

A bit of background: I’ve been developing custom takeoff templates for another company. These include dynamic assemblies for flat sheets that automatically populate accessory dependencies based on specific input parameters. While the system works well, the pricing model we’re tied to is quite steep, which unfortunately hinders scalability and flexibility across projects.

In a short span of time using zzTakeoff, I’ve already noticed several features that set it apart from other tools:

Takeoff Tool Highlights

Dimension

• The ability to easily adjust font size and line width via sliders is a big plus.
• It would be even more helpful if other shape options (aside from the triangle) were available—such as a tick mark, custom arrow, or additional annotation styles.

Count

• The star shape used for counting is awesome! It's visually distinct.

Area

1. Would it be possible to customize the Area tool further by allowing us to link a database or dropdown list within the properties panel—specifically for selecting sheet sizes?
2. If the above is feasible, could the area shape auto-adjust based on the selected sheet size? For example, choosing "2.4m x 1.2m" would automatically form a rectangular shape matching that dimension.

2.1 Additionally, can we include a label sequence number on each generated area shape (e.g., Sheet 1, Sheet 2, etc.)? This would allow users to quickly count and visually reference sheet quantities directly on the drawing.

3. Linear Tool

• When mapping out boxes (e.g., for windows or doors) using the linear tool, would it be possible to extract both X and Y dimensions into the Properties panel, in addition to the current perimeter value?
• This enhancement would allow users to easily pull out width and height measurements and use them to dynamically generate or customize dependencies for jambs, sills, and head flashings, rather than manually calculating these from the perimeter.