#metadata (by a page)

Thanks for the update @Lorin Awesome midnight patch guys 😁Y’all working around the clock now? Great job bringing this one up @Kyle. I didn’t really pick up how much it tweaked my process until you...

On this subject, I’m still lobbying for metadata or tags by plan sheet. I’ve had this functionality with a construction document management software in the past and it was clutch for so much of the...

@heber Great response! TYI think this is going to be a moving target for a lot of different agendas and strategies but looks like a great start. Really just great to know you guys are always “on it...

@Stephen The fact that you guys care is enough for me… 😁 Not a UX minded guy so I have nothing to offer really. Not knowing too much I would say increase padding to table/list component of report ...

Oh, sorry @Stephen forgot.The row (in this case "Blockouts") arrow to expand could not be clicked (or became a slight unexpected challenge) because it fell at just the right spot with the left side...

I assumed the arrow tool had the options to add arrow on either end, one end, or no ends but just realized it didn't. So, yeah I could see this being helpful

Thanks @Stephen for the response. I may be getting my nomenclature incorrect.I thought I had set the assemblies type to inherit the variable/property?

Agreed on the default nomenclature fields being able to be modified or hidden I'm also still lobbying for a navbar at the top of window (red shaded area in snip) or collapsible headers similar to t...

I'm with ya @Kyle, but as @Kory mentioned we all have different styles/requirements to back us into a pre-defined box - even the term (property) SKU drives me nuts when I'm putting a labor type in ...

Yes! This would be really awesome!Also, I'm wondering if when clicking the gear & scrolling to select the properties wanted the list of options could be collapsed under those checkbox headers so we...

Same - looking forward though. And thanks for you guys doing this

I'm loving the way this is going from the individual sums to the simplified (no child) reports

@Lorin Totally random blast from the past... I forgot I posted thisSeems like all good And thanks for the follow-up

Thanks @Stephen, I’ll have to check this out sometime. I ended up just creating a dropdown custom with values

Ok, just checking. TY

Might be an issue with the list items?I kept getting this error. Ended up just clicking on the new fancy "Convert to Item" button

@Kyle So for example what if the workflow involve a top-level LF takeoff driving a nested assembly? I would want to ensure that a single LF input at Level 1 can correctly scale Level 3 sub-items th...

Can’t wait to check out assemblies. Lots of great updates. Happy about targeted page search. That’s a good start to bring able to search and count/highlight feature. I’m really excited 💥 about tak...

Well, I’m always down with that kind of flexibility!

NameDescription [text variable]QtyUOMPossibly a count of a set (eg. XX of XX) I’m assuming these would all be toggle? I like the idea @Kory put out there for schedule pieces (TMH, days, etc) - if I...

Awesome @Lorin! Ty for update. I was trying the ":" & "." methods intuitively from the UOM method but nada...Looking forward to many great things to come and so happy with everything so far - much ...

@Lorin than you do much for the follow-up (another #goodegg) i will check it out shortly and see how it goes. Love the idea of dynamic lists!

Wouldn’t this lead to an almost unmanageable list of “Custom Properties” groups and the individual parts within?