Excellent 👍🏻 Thanks Casey 🙂

Hi Casey. I believe this issue is resolved now. Is it working properly for you?

Looking great Todd 🙂

Thanks for the input guys. I'm even open to allowing full transparency (at 0% opacity). Just trying to help avoid someone missing counting things. Here are some comparisons:

Hi Bryan! We've had some discussion internally about adding a chat feature. Any input is welcome from the community to make it as useful as possible. 🙂 It would be fun to be able to send "bookm...

Thanks for all the input here. We have had various users that do takeoffs as a service requesting time tracking, since some of them do billing by the hour for their services. This is something we p...

Hi Chris! Thanks for reporting. We will dig into this.

Hi Jim! Yes, we will be allowing API access in the future. We also are planning some kind of Plugin Store where users can share templates, formulas, scripts, etc. This is going to be a lot of fu...

We just released a patch. Is it working properly for you now?

Hi Bryan! Thanks for reporting. We'll get this fixed. We did add the folders to the dropdown as you suggested in the Inside Track 🙂

Jes, I'm having Lorin contact you to see if we can jump on a qucik Zoom call to get more details. We will fix ASAP.

Thanks Rulon. Sorry about that. We had made an update that allowed items with sub-items (for future advanced assemblies), and just needed to fix 1 small bug.

We just finished a repair on this. Is it working properly for you now?

Sorry about the hassle. We are working on a repair, and will have it fixed soon. All the data is still there. Please don't try moving them, and we'll get it fixed up.

Thanks for reporting. We will dig into this right away.

Hi Jim! They are both very similar, but if you have a "Code + Name" dropdown, then it will show the code at the beginning for the dropdown options. If Value + Name, then the value is more a behin...

Thanks for the feedback & discussion here. We'll make it so that when you "Show All" it will find any parent takeoffs and force them to visible, also.

Thanks for the input. Yeah, we may need to start with just taking the linear distance * width to get area for now to keep it simple. Then we could release an update in the future to enable "true ...

Thanks guys! We will for sure be adding image search in the future. We'll keep pushing as fast as we can. Thanks for all your feedback and support. 🙂